UTAH UTES

How To Fix Targeting Debacle In College Football

Dec 9, 2019, 1:42 PM | Updated: 2:11 pm
Justin Herbert #10 of the Oregon Ducks shakes hands with quarterback Tyler Huntley #1 of the Utah U...
Justin Herbert #10 of the Oregon Ducks shakes hands with quarterback Tyler Huntley #1 of the Utah Utes after the Ducks defeated the Utes 37-15 in the Pac-12 Championship Game at Levi's Stadium on December 06, 2019 in Santa Clara, California. (Photo by Thearon W. Henderson/Getty Images)
(Photo by Thearon W. Henderson/Getty Images)

SALT LAKE CITY, UtahĀ – You would think that when there is so much on the line transparency would be prioritized. Unfortunately, for college football fans around the country, and specifically Utah fans, being left in the dark is a frequent feeling.

Utah lost to Oregon 37-15 in a game that had incredibly large implications for both teams. A Pac-12 Championship was on the line, an inaugural College Football Playoff or Rose Bowl birth was also on offer.

Yet, despite the frustration of the loss ticking to boiling point for Utah fans, many also left wondering how and why two very impactful Oregon defenders were allowed to maintain their position(s) on the field.

Targeting Defined

Targeting: ARTICLE 5 a. The replay official shall review all targeting fouls, Rules
9-1-3 and 9-1-4. For a player to be disqualified and the Targeting foul to be
enforced, all elements of a Targeting foul must be confirmed by the Instant
Replay Official. There is no option for stands as a part of a Targeting review. If
any element of Targeting cannot be confirmed, then the Replay Official shall
overturn the targeting foul.
Targeting elements include:
1. Rule 9-1-3:
(a) A player takes aim at an opponent for the purposes of attacking with
forcible contact with the crown of the helmet.
(b) An indicator of targeting is present.
2. Rule 9-1-4:
(a) A defenseless opponent (Rule 2-27-14).
(b) A player takes aim at a defenseless opponent for the purposes of
attacking with forcible contact to the head or neck area.
(c) An indicator of targeting is present.

According to the 2019 NCAA Football Rules and Interpretations.

The first questionable no call came midway through the first quarter after junior safety, Brady Breeze, madeĀ “forcible contact to the head or neck area of Huntley” who was also a “defenseless” player. Huntley was falling forward, with his head faced backward. Breeze lowered his helmet during the act of the tackle.

Breeze would go on to lead the Oregon defense in tackles with nine total and six solo tackles. There is no question the Oregon defense would have suffered tremendously with the absence of Breeze, instead, he remained eligible to play.

The second questionable call and the one that dumbfounded me was when senior linebacker, Troy Dye, made “forcible contact to the head or neck area”Ā of Tyler Huntley with two and a half minutes left in the first half. Dye is seen lunging with the crown of his helmet making contact with the facemask of Tyler Huntley. The facemask, for those wondering, is considered a part of the helmet.

Huntley was not a defenseless player, as he was in the act of throwing. There was no call on the field, either. They were instead reviewing whether Jaylon Dixon caught the ball or whether or not it hit the ground.

Kyle Whittingham’s Comments

Following the second no-call on Huntley, head coach Kyle Whittingham was animated on the sideline. I asked coach as he left the field for the locker room at halftime what exactly the referees told him regarding the two no calls.

“All they told me was that neither play was deemed targeting,” Whittingham said clearly frustrated.

The Fix

There is a simple fix to help fans, players, coaches and everybody involved in college football to better understand what referees review.

You publicize the conversations that take place between the head referee and the review booth.

Following any targeting call, a review takes place. The head referee heads over to his monitor on the field, puts on the headset, and communicates with whoever is in charge of the review booth.

Giving access to the dialogue would change everything. It would allow everybody to better understand what the referees are looking at as well as giving perspective to the final call. Instead, Whittingham continues to be left in the dark.

After any game that has a questionable call (there seems to be a lot of them) Whittingham sends film of the specific play to the Pac-12 to which they answer accordingly.

“They will either tell me that they got the call wrong and wish me luck next week or they will tell me that they got the call right and wish me luck next week,” Whittingham said in a recent press conference.

I also question the integrity of player safety in college football. If the NCAA is sincerely working on creating better player safety, then determining what is and what is not targeting should not be that hard. Concussions and chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE) has become a major issue for the NFL. The numbers in youth sports in America are alarming.

“In team sports, tackle football participation [in 2018] was down 1.3 percent overall [from 2017] with a 5.8 percent drop in core participation (26+ times a year). In the key playing age group of 6 to 17, core participation was down 3.0 percent and is now off 1.9 percent on average over the last five years,” a Forbes report from earlier this year states.

If a player makes forcible contact to the head or neck area, whether the player is deemed defenseless or not, it should be a targeting penalty. It is not rocket science.

If the NFL and NCAA are trying to eliminate concussions and head/neck injuries then they would be doing everything they can to eliminate big hits to the head/neck area and by simply stating that you cannot make contact with the head/neck area no matter the circumstance, you will change the game for the better and ultimately create a safer environment for the players.

The NCAA and the NFL are billion-dollar empires. In any NCAA or NFL game, there is always so much on the line. Yet, here we are discussing why certain decisions were made and the impact it had on a game that could have been career and program defining for the Utah football team.

Instead, we will all pretend like the game never happened and look ahead to the 2020 season in the hopes of yet another trip to the Pac-12 Championship game.

 

 

  • Utah Utes Scoreboard

  • Utah Utes Team Leaders

  • Utah Utes Standings

Utah Utes

Kyle Whittingham Pac-12 Championship...
Michelle Bodkin

Kyle Whittingham On Pac-12 Title Game: We Love The Chip On Our Shoulder

Utah is coming into the Pac-12 Title Game in Las Vegas on Friday against USC as underdogs with a chip on their shoulder.
1 day ago
Oregon vs. Utah...
KSL Sports

Hans Olsen Film Review: Utah Utes Path To Pac-12 Championship Game

In this edition of Hans Olsen's film review, he looks at some plays against the Colorado Buffaloes and the Oregon Ducks that helped lead the Utah Utes to the Pac-12 Championship game
1 day ago
Kyle Whittingham and Britain Covey - Pac-12 Title Game...
Michelle Bodkin

How To Watch No. 12 Utah Vs. No. 4 USC In The Pac-12 Title Game

No. 12 Utah will be taking on No. 4 USC in a rematch from earlier in the year to determine the 2022 Pac-12 Conference Champion.
1 day ago
Eric-Rowe-Miami-Dolphins-Houston-Texans-NFL...
Kyle Ireland

Dolphins DB Eric Rowe Forces Fumble During Win Over Houston Texans

Former Utah Utes and current Miami Dolphins safety Eric Rowe forced a fumble during his team's Week 12 victory over the Houston Texans.
2 days ago
Jim Harding directs during warmup for a University of Utah Football scrimmage in Salt Lake City, Fr...
Michelle Bodkin

Utes Get Commitment From Four-Star Offensive Tackle

It's been a good 24 hours for the Utes clinching a trip the Pac-12 Championship and getting a commitment from a four-star offensive tackle.
2 days ago
Cam Rising - Utah Utes - Oregon Ducks - Pac-12 Championship Game...
Michelle Bodkin

Utah Moves Up In The AP After Advancing To The Pac-12 Championship

In a crazy turn of events, Utah is now on their way to their fourth Pac-12 Championship in five years while also moving up the latest AP Top 25 Poll.
2 days ago
How To Fix Targeting Debacle In College Football